Google search engine optimisation and their 80/20 rule |  | Visited: 2311 |
|
|
| 4.0/5.0 (1 votes total) |
|
|
| | by David Callan October 19, 2006 |
| David Callan |
| Article by David Callan. David is an Internet Marketing and search engine optimisation consultant. Visit his websites SEO tools section for free search engine tools such as an Anchor text checker and Pagerank search which will help you implement the advice in this article |
| David Callan
has written 21 articles for PromotionWorld. |
| View all articles by David Callan... |
Search engine optimisation or optimization
(with a 'z' or is that 'zee' if your from across 'the pond') techniques
are constantly evolving. This evolution is in response to the evolution
of search engines such as Google, Yahoo and MSN. Google in particular
has come to be seen as the most sophisticated and advanced search
engine as it is armed with an array of anti-spam technology.
Google's increasing use of anti-spam features has meant
that optimising websites for Google has become much harder and it's now
not just a case of opening your websites source files in notepad,
adding some keywords into your various HTML tags, uploading your files
and waiting for the results. In fact in my opinion and I'm sure others
will agree with me, this type of optimisation, commonly referred to as
onpage optimisation will only ever be 20% effective at achieving
rankings for any keywords which are even mildly competitive. Those of
us who aced maths in school will know this leaves us with 80%
unaccounted for.
This 80% corresponds to offpage optimization. Offpage
optimization is all to do with the amount of links pointing to your
site and its pages, the actual linking text (anchor text) of these
links and the quality of the pages which the links are on. Offpage
optimisation is now for sure the overwhelmingly dominating factor which
decides where a site will rank in Google. That then is what I mean by
the 80/20 rule, I'm not talking about the pareto rule which means that
in anything a few (20 percent) are vital and many (80 percent) are
trivial, I'm not sure that applies to SEO.
What is the logic behind this then, why does Google
give so much 'weight' (80%) to offpage optimization efforts and so
little (20%) to onpage optimisation. Well simply put it is all about
the quality of their results. Whereas onpage optimisation is completely
controlled by the webmaster and can thus be abused by an unscrupulous
one, offpage optimisation is something that is not controlled by anyone
as such by rather by other webmasters, websites and indeed the Internet
in general. This means that it is much harder to conduct any
underhanded or spammy offpage optimisation methods in the hope of
gaining an unfair advantage for a website in the Google SERPS (Search
Engine Result Pages), this does not mean it is impossible though.
Let's elaborate for a paragraph or two just why offpage
elements such as incoming links are deemed by Google to be such a good
measure of relevancy, thus making offpage optimisation the most
effective method of optimisation by far. Take the anchor text of
incoming links for instance, if Google sees a link from SITE A to SITE
B with the actual linking text being the words 'data recovery london',
then SITE B has just become more relavent and thus more likely to
appear higher in the rankings when someone searches for 'data recovery
london'. SITE B has no control over SITE A (in most cases.) and Google
knows this. Google can then look at the link text and say to itself,
why would SITE A link to SITE B with the specific words 'data recovery
london' if SITE B wasn't 'about' 'data recovery london', there is no
answer so Google must deem SITE B to be 'about' 'data recovery london'.
I said 'in most cases' above because often webmasters
have multiple sites and would crosslink them with keyword rich anchor
text, but there is only so many sites and crosslinks any webmaster can
manage, again Google knows this and so as the number of backlinks and
occurrences of keyword rich anchor text grows (and with that grows the
unlikelihood of anything unnatural like crosslinking going on) so to
does the relevancy of the site which all the backlinks point to.
Imagine hundreds or thousands of sites all linking to a website X with
variations of 'data recovery london' type phrases as the linking text,
well then Google can be pretty dam sure that website X is 'about' 'data
recovery london' and feel confident about returning it in the top 10
results. This is why they place so much importance (80%) on offpage
ranking factors such as links; they are simply the most reliable way of
checking what a site is about and indeed how well it covers what it is
about. This reliance on hard to cheat offpage factors is what produces
the quality search results we all know, love and use everyday.
The moral of the story from an SEO point of view then
is to spend less time on those little website tweaks which you think
might make a big difference (but won't) and work hard on what really
counts, what really counts is how the web 'sees' your website, the more
quality (keyword rich) incoming links your website has the better the
webs 'view' will be and therefore the better Google's view of your
website will be. What Google thinks of your website is very important,
as they 'look after' websites which they like.
|