Microsoft and Yahoo!, Search Engine Partners? How Mergers and Acquisitions May Change the Search Engine Playing Field – and Where Google Comes In
|
 |
Visited: 1338 |
|
|
| 5.0/5.0 (1 votes total) |
|
|
|
|
by Scott Buresh March 26, 2008
|
| Scott Buresh |
 Scott Buresh is the founder of Medium Blue, a search engine optimization company. His articles
have appeared in numerous publications, including MarketingProfs, ZDNet, SiteProNews, WebProNews, DarwinMag, ISEDB.com, and Search Engine Guide. He was
also a contributor to The Complete Guide to Google Advertising (Brown, 2008) and Building Your Business with Google For
Dummies (Wiley, 2004). Medium Blue has
local and national clients, including Boston Scientific, DS Waters, and Wake
Forest University Baptist Medical Center, and was named the number one organic
search engine optimization company in the world in 2006 and 2007 by
PromotionWorld. Visit MediumBlue.com to
request a custom SEO
guarantee based on your goals and
your data. |
| Scott Buresh
has written 37 articles for PromotionWorld. |
| View all articles by Scott Buresh... |
Until recently, there were five major players in the search
engine world: Google, MSN, AOL, Ask.com, and the Yahoo! search engine. These
top Internet search engines quickly could be narrowed down to four, however;
AOL uses the Google algorithm and will yield nearly identical results. Further
narrowing is rapidly occurring – Ask.com seems to be stepping out of the
spotlight to focus on specific markets, and in early March 2008, Microsoft
began attempting to purchase the Yahoo! search engine. If there are just two
top search engines with which to be concerned, what does this mean for your
business and for SEO as a whole?
What's Going On with
the Yahoo! Search Engine?
As almost anybody with access to a news source knows by now,
Microsoft put in an unsolicited offer to purchase the Yahoo! search engine in
early March 2008. Yahoo! rejected this offer at first, saying that it
undervalued its company as one of the top engines (and a provider of other
services, including email and chat, as well). Microsoft did not increase the
offer at this point; it instead decided to enter a proxy battle.
A proxy battle would involve Microsoft putting up its own
board of directors to let shareholders decide if its purchase of the Yahoo!
search engine would be acceptable or not. In essence, Microsoft has decided
that it will attempt to convince shareholders that their interests are better
served by people who will approve this acquisition between two of the top
Internet search engines. And Yahoo! shareholders have been beaten down for some
time, so it is widely expected that the majority will in fact favor this
acquisition.
Meanwhile, Yahoo!, on spurning this offer, began talking
with other companies in order to build strategic partnerships and keep itself
as one of the top engines, as it had been for so long. It was rumored that
MySpace's parent company, News Corporation, was in talks to work with the
Yahoo! search engine, as was Google. However, these talks seem to have fizzled,
and Yahoo!'s board of directors has in fact begun speaking directly with
Microsoft's board. Yahoo! bought a bit of time by delaying the election of its
board, but it's believed that this is all the shareholders will stand for at
this point.
So I'm assuming that if the acquisition goes down, the
Microsoft search engine and the Yahoo! search engine will likely be using the
same algorithm, even if they remain separate sites. It just makes sense to not
spend the money to have two separate research departments, especially when the
Yahoo! search engine is widely regarded to be superior to Microsoft's.
Will Ask.Com Continue
to Be One of the Top Internet Search Engines?
For a time, Ask.com seemed to be trying to go head to head
with Google and to position itself as one of the top Internet search engines,
period. You may remember the "algorithm" ads that it ran for a time
on television. However, recently Ask.com announced that it will instead be
tailoring itself to the niche market share of which it already has control. In
other words, they're no longer trying to be all things to all people in the way
that other top search engines like, well, Yahoo! and Google are.
What we know about Ask.com's demographic is that it is
largely female, although Ask.com refutes the notion that it is focusing on "older
women." According to an article in Forbes, an Ask.com spokesperson said
that:
…reports of the site becoming
oriented towards older women are false and were fueled by an erroneous
Associated Press article that has since been changed. Ask acknowledged that
married women do compose a lot of its core users and these matronly queries are
often dictionary, thesaurus, encyclopedia type queries - as well as categories
like health and entertainment…[1]
Seeing as Ask.com also laid off 8% of its staff at the same
time that it refocused, it seems clear that the company is no longer aiming to
be considered one of the top Internet search engines.
And this means that we are down to two search engine
technologies dominating the entire landscape: Google and a MSN/Yahoo! search
engine hybrid (Micro-hoo? Yah-soft?).
How Will This Affect
Consumers?
If there truly are only two major top Internet search
engines, the industry will be rather like Coke vs. Pepsi. Sure there are other,
smaller players like RC Cola that some people will be brand loyal about, but
for the most part it's either Big Guy One or Big Guy Two.
And this means that businesses that had good rankings and
that were getting good traffic from, say, Ask.com and MSN but not the Yahoo!
search engine will be in a bind. With only two top Internet search engines,
there will be less real estate to compete for and the same number of businesses
vying for this real estate.
How Will This Affect
SEO Companies?
In one sense, having only two serious engines makes the job
easier for search engine optimization companies – there's just less algorithms
to absorb and master. However, it makes the opportunity for volatility much
more likely. Before, if the Google or Yahoo! search engine changed its
algorithm, you had three or four other engines to fall back on while you worked
to update your practices. But with only two major players, a tweak to either
the Google or MSN/Yahoo! search engine algorithm could have much further
reaching implications to individual companies in the search space.
Who Will Compete
Next?
Google has been coasting for many years as being seen as the
underdog in the industry – the cool, hip engine to use that's not owned by the
big guys. However, search engine optimization practitioners have started to see
some cracks in that veneer. The truth of the matter is that Microsoft is seen
as a huge corporate conglomerate, but Google is starting to be seen as one as
well. And now Google has to answer to shareholder, rather than just going along
trying to "not be evil." Google has its own set of privacy issues and
conflicts of interest, such as its recent purchase of DoubleClick, which came
along with a SEO company. [See my recent
article on this topic for more information.]
So when there are just two top Internet search
engines, the door is opened for competition. If another company can come along
technologically that is on par with the Google and Yahoo! search engine
algorithms and that does not have huge corporate considerations, it could very
well start gaining some market share in this space. I'll let you know if I see
any contenders.
|