Chasing Leads: Offline Lead Tracking in SEM Campaigns, Pt. 2 |  | Visited: 1198 |
|
|
| 5.0/5.0 (1 votes total) |
|
|
| | by Scott Buresh October 11, 2010 |
| Scott Buresh |
 Scott Buresh, internationally recognized internet marketing authority
and CEO of search marketing firm Medium Blue, is consistently published
and cited by influential industry publications and contributed to How to Build Your Own Web Site with Little or No Money: The Complete Guide for Business and Personal Use (Brown, 2010), The Complete Guide to Google Advertising (Atlantic, 2008) and Building Your Business with Google for Dummies (Wiley, 2004).
In both 2008 and 2010, Medium Blue was honored to receive a prestigious
American Marketing Association award. Medium Blue is an Atlanta search
engine optimization company with local and national clients, including
the Atlanta Humane Society, Afterburner, Inc., Oliver Wight Americas and
DeKalb Medical. To see how we can help you achieve your online
marketing goals, please contact us. |
| Scott Buresh
has written 56 articles for PromotionWorld. |
| View all articles by Scott Buresh... |
The newly coined term 'results measurement' is used by companies to
define the purposes of lead tracking in SEM campaigns, and is a valuable
means of understanding the many decision factors your prospects use to
choose your company for its products/services. A finely-tuned lead
tracking channel - often aided by your search engine marketing company –
demonstrates to the potential customer that his or her inquiry about
your company's products/services was received with a sense of urgency.
For SEM campaigns, proper lead tracking may not be the only fast track
solution to increased sales, but does give potential customers insight
into how your company values its leads. With a greater ability to track
leads and responses, an immediate follow-up is also possible, allowing
prospects to decide if your response time was fast enough and if your
company provided a better customer experience than your competitors.
In the last article, we discussed how an ideal lead tracking scenario
equates to greater success when it comes to closing leads in SEM
campaigns. Plus, knowing where your leads come from helps determine
which channel is the most profitable and, of course, which should be
continually refined to bring in even more quality leads. Though this may
be common knowledge, we are led to the two less-than-ideal scenarios
that are unfortunate, though surprisingly frequent, despite the
prevalence of comprehensive lead tracking software and tools.
Lead Tracking Scenarios
Scenario #2: Workable – The client company cannot, for
whatever reason, have web leads automatically populated in its sales
database, which, in this case, is often a proprietary system built
in-house. Yet, there are still some ways to identify leads properly,
which your search engine marketing company can help you compile for SEM
campaigns. PPC leads, for example, can be supplemented with added
parameters when sent to an inbox to reveal their source. With the right
lead tracking in place, you can easily have emails pop right into your
inbox with a header that notifies you that you've just received a lead
via a specific channel. In these cases, the onus is on the person who
enters the leads into the sales database to also include the lead's
source.
Ideally, your search engine marketing company needs to meet and/or
correspond regularly with you to discuss the source and quality of each
lead within your SEM campaigns. Leads can be analyzed at the individual
level, so that when a lead closes, it can be attributed to the proper
channel (organic SEO, email marketing, PPC, etc). With frequent
collaboration between the search engine marketing company and the client
company, ROI for each individual channel can be deduced, and
expenditures on each channel can be properly allocated to maximize
performance.
Scenario #3: Common but Unfortunate – In this scenario,
the client company usually has limited offline lead tracking ability.
Sometimes the leads are sent directly to varying sales people who use
their own individual systems for tracking their leads within SEM
campaigns.
Clearly, this limits the ability of the search engine marketing
company to properly allocate ROI to individual web channels. Even if
the individual sales people take note of where the individual leads came
from, compiling all of that data into something useful can be a bit
like herding cats. The client company also can't determine which online
sales and marketing initiatives are the most effective to developing
SEM campaigns and could therefore unknowingly cut the most profitable
initiatives when times are tough. Another consequence is that your sales
department could be spending time chasing bad leads from the same
sources day after day and not even know it.
Furthermore, when your search engine marketing company is trying to
come up with ROI calculations, the math tends to get fuzzy. You and your
search engine marketing company are left with vague numbers regarding
offline closure rates, value of the average sale, and the like, making
any attempt at deriving useful ROI figures a virtual stab in the dark.
As you can imagine, such a system does not allow for informed decisions
in regard to your individual online initiatives.
Increasing Your SEM Lead Tracking Abilities for Success
As a company, we work very hard to get clients up to at least the
workable scenario (#2) in order to prove the value of individual online
initiatives and to knowledgably hone SEM campaigns for the best possible
return. Even though scenario #3 isn't the most effective and modern
way to run a sales department, it is still fairly common. We've had many
clients who had very weak tracking elements in place, and, step by
step, we've cajoled them into a more uniform and robust tracking system.
Almost invariably, once clients see the impact on their bottom lines
through improved lead tracking, they start demanding more and more
tracking information and transparency - rightly so. Of course, any good
search engine marketing company will be more than happy to oblige.
|